wow mcmoose thats amazing i really like it.
Miscellaneous Pictures
McMoose26 Feb 2008
Thanks. heres a couple moreMcMoose26 Feb 2008
moose wouldnt of looked better if the water was smooth as a babies bottom but yeah still sick, last one is average
wouldnt of looked better?
<-Ben->26 Feb 2008nah looks way better with the water moving.
clownie27 Feb 2008
a friendmcmoose wat camera do u have?
is it just a p&s?
is it just a p&s?
!D.F! - It's an Oly E-300. Seriously, does no one here no what EXIF data is, or how to find it?
*know what.
I can't stand those style of contractions, so my accident my be fixed.
I can't stand those style of contractions, so my accident my be fixed.
McMoose27 Feb 2008Thanks for that Klips. Dunno what ya 2nd post means though!
!D.F! - yeah^ nothin' special, im happy with it.
Lookin to do some courses though. Get a bit more tech.
Any tips/pointers appreciated.
!D.F! - yeah^ nothin' special, im happy with it.
Lookin to do some courses though. Get a bit more tech.
Any tips/pointers appreciated.
i wanna see something other then sunset/nature stuff mcmoose
McMoose27 Feb 2008ummmm ........... like what?
arty farty stuff?
arty farty stuff?
{Ryan R}27 Feb 2008 water drops photos? or maybe reflective puddle shots theyve never been done before?
The second post was correct the first, and explaining that I'm a terrible pedant when it comes to my own spelling and grammar. For example, I properly punctuate all text messages I send (although I can't really be arsed capitalising a lot of the time, ti's the one thing I let slide).
Oh, and you should get the Zuiko 14-35 f/2, it looks like a fucking monster of a lens and due to the Oly 4/3 sensor gives it a film equivalent of 28-70. Yeah, it zooms at f/2. That's insane! Then again, so is the price tag (2.3 grand in US$, and don't forget to add either postage and GST or 'Australis is shit for camera gear' tax). But it would be a killer lens!
Oh, and you should get the Zuiko 14-35 f/2, it looks like a fucking monster of a lens and due to the Oly 4/3 sensor gives it a film equivalent of 28-70. Yeah, it zooms at f/2. That's insane! Then again, so is the price tag (2.3 grand in US$, and don't forget to add either postage and GST or 'Australis is shit for camera gear' tax). But it would be a killer lens!
McMoose27 Feb 2008$2.3G's. Geeeeez-us!
I've got a Zuiko 14-45 & Zuiko 40-150. ?
What the 4/3 sensor mean?
I've got a Zuiko 14-45 & Zuiko 40-150. ?
What the 4/3 sensor mean?
hey clownie, your friend has 6 fingers
holy shit i want six fingers!
McMoose28 Feb 2008Freaky bitch!!!!!!!!!
MC MOOSE
dude you must know this but your one dam talented photogrpaher,ive seen photos by professionals/national geographic shots/landscape photogrpahy/coffee table photo books and your work is definately equal if not far better than alot of what i have seen.
This may not mean much as it is coming from a complete stranger,but seriously whereva you wish you take your work i really hope it more than a hobby for you bcoz you definately have the skill/talent and passion to take it where ever you want it to.
DAM your work is amzing,good luck to ya not that you'll be needing it.
PEACE
enjoy getting even better! if thats at all possible
dude you must know this but your one dam talented photogrpaher,ive seen photos by professionals/national geographic shots/landscape photogrpahy/coffee table photo books and your work is definately equal if not far better than alot of what i have seen.
This may not mean much as it is coming from a complete stranger,but seriously whereva you wish you take your work i really hope it more than a hobby for you bcoz you definately have the skill/talent and passion to take it where ever you want it to.
DAM your work is amzing,good luck to ya not that you'll be needing it.
PEACE
enjoy getting even better! if thats at all possible
McMoose
06:59 28/Feb
$2.3G's. Geeeeez-us!
I've got a Zuiko 14-45 & Zuiko 40-150. ?
What the 4/3 sensor mean?
Its Olympus sensor system, i have no idea why they did it because Nikon crop factor is 1.5x, Canon is 1.6x/1.3x but Olympus had to make a fucking 2x Crop. whats me laugh was when the Olympus rep came into work and told me about there lenses saying how good they are (the glass is sick) but he said all the Digital glass on any lens going from $200-$5000 is the same glass no matter what, kinda odd. all you pay for the the build and the f/stop.
06:59 28/Feb
$2.3G's. Geeeeez-us!
I've got a Zuiko 14-45 & Zuiko 40-150. ?
What the 4/3 sensor mean?
Its Olympus sensor system, i have no idea why they did it because Nikon crop factor is 1.5x, Canon is 1.6x/1.3x but Olympus had to make a fucking 2x Crop. whats me laugh was when the Olympus rep came into work and told me about there lenses saying how good they are (the glass is sick) but he said all the Digital glass on any lens going from $200-$5000 is the same glass no matter what, kinda odd. all you pay for the the build and the f/stop.
how old are u McMoose u said u wanna do a course or something would u be keen on PSC
are u in melbourne?
are u in melbourne?
The big advantage of the 4/3 sensor is... actually the only real advantage that I know of is that they make smaller sensors (cramming the photosites in tighter for the same megapixels) so that your glass' range is effectively longer. The real reason you buy Olympus is because (a) they're cheap, small and well built or (b) you're loaded and can afford Ziess glass to go on the front end.
Disadvantages? Well, the main one is that more crammed photosite usually means more noise. Also, Canon and Nikon and Pentax and Sony don't use them, so there's not all that much money going into them, only Oly and ... someone else (can't remember who though) use them. At least it's not Sigma, who are the ONLY people using the Foveon sensor, but that's another story. I don't think Oly will really be ale to keep up for allll that much longer if they continue with the 4/3, as with most of the big companies going for CMOS or CCD sensors that's where the real breakthroughs are likely to happen.
Disadvantages? Well, the main one is that more crammed photosite usually means more noise. Also, Canon and Nikon and Pentax and Sony don't use them, so there's not all that much money going into them, only Oly and ... someone else (can't remember who though) use them. At least it's not Sigma, who are the ONLY people using the Foveon sensor, but that's another story. I don't think Oly will really be ale to keep up for allll that much longer if they continue with the 4/3, as with most of the big companies going for CMOS or CCD sensors that's where the real breakthroughs are likely to happen.
dean12328 Feb 2008haha 6 finger freak. good spotting dunny
Klips knows his shit. CCD is dieing in the arse now anyway. CMOS is the way.