Miscellaneous Pictures — skateboard.com.au

G

GodHatesUsAll

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 12:12 PM

yeah, I hate that shit...
Frank, all of your photography here is fuckin rad, so you must be doing something right.
& my entry folio was nothing special, worse than a first year arts student (no hate to art students).
The lecturers looked at the folio for less than 5 minutes, the interview was hell relaxed and casual. All they asked really was what experience I had, why I wanted to study photography, which photographers influence my style etc. etc. just general questions about photography and life....

G

GodHatesUsAll

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 12:14 PM

But yeah, prob depends on whether or not you want to just a photography degree, or something more broad, i.e. an industrial design degree...

Frank.C

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 12:22 PM

What course are you doing now?

I wanted to do "Photography (Industrial and Scintific)" at RMIT but didn't end up putting it in as one of my preferences. I could still apply for it given that I fulfill the extra requirements (interview) and then when change of preferences is available put it in.

Frank.C

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 1:14 PM

I scanned up a few B&W. :S

Frank.C

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 1:15 PM

Greed

Frank.C

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 1:17 PM

another film shot

Frank.C

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 1:17 PM

Portrait

Frank.C

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 1:21 PM

Frank.C

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 1:22 PM

G

GodHatesUsAll

5 Oct 2005 · 5 Oct 2005 10:45 PM

Yeah, thats what Im doing... Industrial / sci photo.
it's a lot more technical than just a commercial photography degree. Which is good and bad.

B

ben k

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 12:50 AM

pretty miscellaneous question i guess
this is out of pure curiosity after a deep and meaningful stoned conversation about photography....haha

whats the smallest apt you can get...? and is it really expensive? what are they used for....landscapes im guessing and like city shots and shit....

thanks for any answers

P

Pig.

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 1:06 AM

I heard a company made Stanley Kubrik a lens with an apeture of either 1 or .5, I dont remember the exact figure. But he needed just the one lens for the one shot in a movie. And they made it for him. Yeh it was KINDA of topic, but yeh
Bout that

hartley

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 2:04 AM

f1 is the smallest Canon or Nikon make

B

ben k

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 2:22 AM

i mean biggest...haha fuck
still getting confused
like an apt 100 or something

N

Newidude

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 9:04 AM

No ben, you were right. Smallest apature is highest numerically. Widest is lowest numerically

Frank.C

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 10:42 AM

"Abandoned Youth"

C

crazy eyes

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 2:42 PM

elmo needs a hug

E

elder

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 4:37 PM

i think he meant aperture like f64 and higher (small aperture)
what's the largest above f64 (in numbers) that people have got upto?

E

elder

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 4:39 PM

that black and white portrait of the girl is really fucking sharp frank
narce

JERRYSK8

8 Oct 2005 · 8 Oct 2005 10:44 PM

whats the aperture of a pinhole?

S

seargent nips

9 Oct 2005 · 9 Oct 2005 4:45 AM

the underwater shots on the previous couple of pages are just incredible. frank c elmo shot is also a cool on ei htink

B

ben k

9 Oct 2005 · 9 Oct 2005 8:19 AM

...of a lens...

and yer i was err just testing everyone to see iof they knew the apeture opposite thing...

Lazarus219

9 Oct 2005 · 9 Oct 2005 10:03 AM

Well mates elan has F90 something as its highest value in the manual, dont know if he's tested it yet though

hartley

9 Oct 2005 · 9 Oct 2005 10:15 AM

sure its not a nikon F90? :P

tree

10 Oct 2005 · 10 Oct 2005 8:10 AM

it sounds logical to assume that the largest aparture size would be 1. maybe i'm wrong.